hardwarekillo.blogg.se

Volume licensing microsoft effective vs unresolved
Volume licensing microsoft effective vs unresolved





volume licensing microsoft effective vs unresolved volume licensing microsoft effective vs unresolved
  1. #VOLUME LICENSING MICROSOFT EFFECTIVE VS UNRESOLVED SOFTWARE#
  2. #VOLUME LICENSING MICROSOFT EFFECTIVE VS UNRESOLVED LICENSE#

With volume licensing, the company pays only for the software license, rather than the retail box set with CDs/downloads, manuals, packaging and the like. Volume Licensing is aimed at business, from small companies to large enterprises.

#VOLUME LICENSING MICROSOFT EFFECTIVE VS UNRESOLVED LICENSE#

This can be broadly broken down into three sections - Volume Licensing, Retail Licensing, and SPLA (Service Provider License Agreement) or ISVR (Independent Software Vendor Royalty) licensing. This section will deal with how licensing is delivered. Links are provided at the end of the tip for further reading. In the sections below, I will start with models of delivering licenses and move through the various considerations, such as support model, license type, virtualization, high-availability solutions, licensing for previous versions, and mention some of the rules that apply in different circumstances. SQL Server 2012 is a Cloud Ready Information Platform.' Consider this extract from their main page on SQL Server 2012 licensing : 'SQL Server 2012 is a significant product release, providing Mission Critical Confidence with greater uptime, blazing-fast performance and enhanced security features for mission critical workloads Breakthrough Insight with managed self-service data exploration and stunning interactive data visualization capabilities and Cloud On Your Terms by enabling the creation and extension of solutions across on-premises and public cloud. Awash with buzzwords and over-hyped fad terms (you say 'cloud', I say 'someone else's server') the overall effect is to confuse rather than enlighten. Unfortunately they haven't been very clear about the licensing differences, with pages upon pages of marketing bumpf aimed at purchasers and not professionals. With the introduction of SQL Server 2012, Microsoft has overhauled their existing per-processor licensing model to recognize that many customers are now using multi-core servers in both physical and virtual configurations. But how do you explain the licensing model to others in a clear, easy-to-understand way? In this tip I intend to explain the SQL Server 2012 licensing consideration by consideration, briefly and without ambiguity (if I actually achieve this aim, please leave comments at the end of this tip). You need to find the best-value to convince your management that the move to SQL Server 2012 will be worth the money. You've heard horror stories about the SQL Server 2012 licensing model - double the cost, double the complexity.

volume licensing microsoft effective vs unresolved

You are a database professional considering or implementing a move to SQL Server 2012 from your current database configuration. By: Derek Colley | Updated: | Comments (23) | Related: More > Licensing







Volume licensing microsoft effective vs unresolved